Dear Senator Hatch- July 25th, 2009
Hurrah for the 24th Celebrated yesterday and Utah's Statehood! Thank you for your letter Dated July 9th,2009.
Pertaining to the 4th paragraph I think your statement in paragraph 3 that "there are some potentially complicated laws regarding U.S. Citizenship", underestimates the simplicity of our beautiful constitution. I am concerned when a lawyer or a Judge says it's complicated and cant' answer a direct question... (as Sotomayor couldn't answer directly wither the 2nd Amendment gave the right for citizens to defend themselves in their own home from harm and accident and the right to bear arms. I'm very happy you didn't give your support to her nomination.) and its pretty simple. In regards to the 14th Amendment you quoted 4th paragraph...
" All person born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." , I would bring your attention to this;
Paragraph 30 of the Amended Complaint in Keyes v. Obama in the Law Suit filed in the Central District of California to be heard by Speedy Trial on Obama's Qualification s and Eligibility by a retired Marine and now Judge David Carter:
In explaining the meaning of Natural Born Citizen, a principal framer of the 14th amendment, which redefined citizenship under the Constitution, John Armor Bingham explained that the phrase referred to “every human being born in the jurisdiction of the United States to parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty”. (Emphasis added).
I will try to send you the whole Amended Complaint because I still believe in Order for you to Honor the constituents that elected you in your oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution it is critical that you Motion for a Senate Verification of Qualification for de facto if not de jure President Obama.
Please bare in mind the near 500,000 people who have signed on a petition on WND demanding Obama simply hand over a $12 original long form birth certificate that has the hospital, delivery doctor, place and date of birth that can be verified independently and the gentlemanly way to do that would be in the Senate. That's eye to eye... brother of freedom and liberty to brother of freedom and liberty. Not in a court lawyer to lawyer... with the Judge acting as Dad forcing the issue. It is going to court, but I am still of the mind that if you asked politely to avoid an embarrassing impeachment process it actually might not be used against you when it comes out in the TRIAL anyway.
I guess you know recently that a Hospital in Hawaii posted on it's web site Obama's letter stating:
"As a beneficiary of the excellence of Kapi'olani Medical Center – the place of my birth – I am pleased to add my voice to your chorus of supporters," Obama since before the election was purportedly born at Honolulu's Queen's medical Center and within hours of the published letters a number of information sites, such as United Press International and the hoax-busting Snopes.com, swapped their long-published location of Obama's birth from Honolulu's Queen's Medical Center to Kapi'olani battling his own grandmother who in an interview said he was born in Kenya and she was present at the time of his birth there. It seems Senator that a lie wants to come out and reveal itself.
The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny nor any of Obama's records relating to or touching upon any of Obama's travel abroad prior to 2000, including but not limited to his self-reported travel in 1981 to Pakistan when U.S. Citizens were banned from traveling to Pakistan.
Many people remain unaware a child does not even have to be born in Hawaii to receive a Certification of Live Birth, the very "evidence" the White House has cited in defending its assertion Obama was born in Hawaii.
Now the Department of Defense has allegedly compelled a private employer to fire a U.S. Army Reserve major from his civilian job after he had his military deployment orders revoked for arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office. The military Sir is cracking as this virus infects the ranks and deserves your attention.. please.
Your Brother in Freedom and Liberty... may the brothers in the Mountains take a stand for our Constitution is hanging by a thread! Please..Motion for a hearing of Verification of Qualification to avoid impeachment and if what you say is true... Barrack Obama and everyone of these honorable people who posted his birth certificate as you insist surely won't have ANY PROBLEM reasserting the truth with the integrity you profess they have.
Cody Robert Judy
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SANTA ANA (SOUTHERN) DIVISION
Captain Pamela Barnett, §
Lt. Colonel Richard Norton Bauerbach §
Captain Robin D. Biron §
Colonel John D. Blair, §
Mr. David L. Bosley, §
Ms. Loretta G. Bosley, §
Captain Harry G. Butler, §
Representative Glenn Casada, Tennessee §
Jennifer Leah Clark, §
Representive Timothy Comerford, NH §
Charles Crusemire, §
Representative Cynthia Davis, Missouri § Civil Action No.:
Chief Warrant O. Thomas S. Davidson § SACV09-00082- DOC (Anx)
Wiley S. Drake, §
Matthew Michael Edwards, § TRIAL-BY-JURY
Lt. Jason Freese, § DEMANDED
Mr. Kurt C. Fuqua, §
Officer Clint Grimes, §
Julliett Ireland, §
- Andrew Johnson, §
Israel D. Jones, §
State RepTimothy Jones, ESQ, MO §
Ambassador Alan Keyes, Ph.D., §
Commander David Fullmer LaRoque, §
Gail Lightfoot, §
MIL officer US Army Lita M. Lott, §
Major David Grant Mosby, §
MSGT Steven Kay Neuenschwander, §
State Representative Frank Niceley, TN §
Retired Senator Jerry O’Neil, Montana, §
SFC E7 Robert Lee Perry , §
Colonel Harry Riley, §
Markham Robinson, §
Sergeant Jeffrey Wayne Rosner §
MSGT Jeffrey Schwilk, §
Captain David Smithey, §
Lt. Commander John Bruce Steidel, §
Cmdr. Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth §
Thomas J Taylor, §
Representative Eric Swafford, Tennessee §
Captain Neil B. Turner, §
Richard E. Venable, §
LCDR Jeff Graham Winthrope, and §
Lt. Colonel Mark Wriggle, §
Barack Hussein Obama, §
Michelle L.R. Obama, §
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, §
Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, §
Joseph R. Biden, Vice-President and §
President of the Senate, §
07-18-09 Amended Complaint " Obama's Q set for Quick & Speedy Trial
Senator Bennett as this trial gets underway I want you to know I have done everything in my power to get you to submit for a Hearing of Qualification for verification in the Senate and that your resistence to this is indeed in question of defence of our U.S. Constitution and paragraph 114 of this law suit and if I were you my concern would be of the embarrassment to your constitutency should this trial end and your position be lacking in committement to our U.S. Constitution.
Cody Robert Judy
I request once again Senator Bennett that you ask for a hearing of Verification of Qualification for President Obama. Please review the work of a professional at this web site and I have forwarded the text for you to be aware of also to refute what you wrote me in your letter with evidence from a professional of this field.
In addition I invite you to see the 378,098 Americans signing the petititon for openess and transparency of the Long Form Birth Certificate of Pres. Obama Here. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81550
Please regard this as an effort to uphold our U.S. Constitution for the future generations of which would be very honored if you would sacrifice any and all public popularity in favor of future generations and a America that is a Constitutional Republic.
Best regards, Your Brother in Freedom and Liberty
Cody Robert Judy
People say that Obama released a genuine copy of his actual Certification of Live Birth.
He never did, and they are mistaken, misinformed, or misleading others if they do.
People say that Hawaii confirmed this copy to be Obama's actual Certification of Live Birth.
Hawaii never confirmed a request for, nor the printing of, this Certification of Live Birth.
People say that Factcheck verified this image as Obama's actual Certification of Live Birth.
Factcheck was complicit in falsifying this image and passing it off as a genuine scan.
Obama also knows that this image is fake and doesn't contain his actual birth information.
That's why Obama and his staff refuse to answer any questions about his birth certificate.
It's been more than two years since Obama announced his candidacy for President, and five months since he was elected President, yet Obama has repeatedly refused to provide any proof that he is Constitutionally qualified to be President. Despite what you may have heard, Obama's eligibility issue has never been settled. If you are looking for reasons why, there is only one reason that you should know:
Barack Hussein Obama flat-out refuses to show the one document that would confirm or deny his true identity, parentage, and birth origin -- his original, "vault" birth certificate.
In March 2008, a lawsuit was filed to remove John McCain, the GOP candidate, from the ballot because his natural-born status was also in doubt. John McCain immediately responded by showing his actual, original birth certificate to Congress.
On June 12, 2008, about three months after John McCain settled his eligibility issue, the pressure on Obama to do the same led to the release of what was called his "original birth certificate" -- an image copy, not a paper copy, by his campaign, not by himself, to the Daily Kos blog, not to Congress, or to anyone even remotely responsible for vetting him.
Moreover, what Obama submitted for "release," was not an image copy of his original birth certificate as claimed. It was an abbreviated transcript of a birth record called a "Certification of Live Birth." HOWEVER, the image itself was a fabricated forgery intended to mimic this transcript. Since a forged birth document cannot represent a true birth record, it means that someone committed forgery just to keep Obama's actual birth record from ever being known. What makes it a forgery?
Many people who also saw this image (see Appendix A) had said that it was a "fake," and that the document pictured in the image could not possibly be genuine. The image anomalies that they pointed out as proof of a forgery included those that I had found and reported, working independently. Here is an annotated list of them:
The image contains digital signatures of Photoshop
Only one side of alleged COLB shown (COLB is two-sided)
Missing second-fold line while first fold-line is shown
Missing the embossed Seal of Hawaii
Missing the State Registrar's signature
Unusual and unnatural pixilation between the letters of text data
Original text was removed by pasting a layer of background over them
Different text was typed onto a text layer and merged with background layer
Pixel blocks of text data are different from the data headers
Heavy and unnecessary sharpening of the whole image, except for the border
Border was created as a separate layer and merged with other layers
Border pattern is more blurred than the background
Border pattern more transparent than those on genuine scans
Top and bottom black border bars have less pixilation than text
Border bars are more black in color than any of the text
Absence of green, background pixels inside the border bar text
White lines between border bars and pattern (both sides)
Image colors are very different from scan images of real COLBs
Lack of pixilation in black rectangle covering certificate number
Different blocking artifacts from JPG compression found across the image
In my final report, "Obama's Born Conspiracy," these anomalies are explained in greater detail.
The consensus among all of us was that this Certification of Live Birth document image (COLB) had been heavily doctored. What we didn't know were the lengths to which the Obama Campaign and his enablers in the media went to rebuff any claims of forgery by personally attacking anyone for even suggesting it. They called us "tin-foil hat wearing, right-wing conspiracy nuts," or "birthers" for short, but these titles are tame in comparison to the vicious and virulent slurs hurled our way. Rather than respond with some confirmatory evidence to support the claim that the scan image was genuine, they offered all kinds of logical excuses as to why it wouldn't be fake, coupled with comments from individuals and fact-checking groups claiming to be non-partisan but clearly shilling for Obama. The common denominator here is that all of them failed to provide a single shred of valid evidence that Obama's actual COLB document was even printed in June 2007 by Hawaii's DOH, let alone scanned a year later.
One thing that no one could deny was that a black, graphic rectangle was added to the image to redact the COLB's certificate number, and then resaved, permanently altering the COLB shown in the image, and in effect, changing the image itself. The following caveat appears on the COLB document:
ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE
In other words,"Which part of this caveat did the "birther" critics NOT understand?
There were enough alterations in this one image to fill a book on "How to falsify an image and hide the signs of forgery.". Nothing about this image was genuine, yet, five weeks later, Factcheck posted a set of nine digital photos of what they claim was the same, alleged birth certificate used to make the scan image.
What's wrong with this picture? (or should I say, "pictures?")
If what's shown in the scan image is bogus, then what's shown in Factcheck's photos must also be bogus. We already knew that Factcheck was a shill for Obama along with being an accomplice to his document fraud. So, we were not surprised when Factcheck launched an all-out assault on the "birthers" and their "right-wing conspiracy theories" along with the photos they posted on their website. Factcheck's COLB photos allegedly show the front side of the embossed Seal that was not shown in the scan image (except while under image enhancements). These COLB photos also show the second fold-line that never was seen in the scan image under any conditions.
Factcheck intended their photos to verify the existence of a real COLB document that the claim was used to make the scan image. Unfortunately for Factcheck, their photos actually verify that their scan image was bogus. For if this document object, with its pronounced second fold-line and heavily embossed Seal, was used to make the original scan image, then the scanner would never have missed copying these prominent features. Added to that revelation is the suspicious failure of Factcheck to photograph the most important part of the document, the entire embossed Seal as seen from both sides. Factcheck's photos taken from the back side of the Seal show that the top third of the Seal was deliberately cropped from the picture. Even in the full shot of the Seal, the top one-third of it was also cut off -- well below the second fold line.
Rather than lend credibility to the original scan image, these photos supported my conclusions that the scan image was not made from a genuine document, but was fabricated from other images. A top, forensic document examiner also agrees with my conclusions. The fact that Obama's original birth certificate is not the only document being withheld from view, only underscores the immense effort taken to keep Obama's real identity from ever being known.
If the Obama narrative is real, and Obama really is who he says he is, then why are there no real documents to verify it, such as his Punahou School records, Selective Service Registration, Occidental College records, Passport (used to visit Pakistan), Columbia College records, Columbia thesis, Harvard College records, Baptism certificate, Medical records, Illinois State Senate records, Law License application, Law practice client list, and University of Chicago scholarly articles?
Does anyone see a pattern here?
From the first day he ran for President, Barack Obama, a constitutional lawyer, knew that he was not a natural-born citizen and not constitutionally qualified to become President. But, he ran anyway. Obama may also have known that he was not born in Hawaii, that he came to Hawaii as an illegal immigrant, and that he was never naturalized as a US citizen.
Does that sound like a viable MOTIVE for not showing his original birth certificate?
If all of the information shown on the scan image were true, then there would not be any reason to hide the original. If all of the information shown on Factcheck's photos were true, then there would not be any reason to hide the original. If all of the information we've seen is actually true, then why fabricate bogus birth certificates when a real one can be made for $12? What is worth committing felony document fraud just to keep it hidden?
Well, it's a lot more than that. This bogus birth certificate was used to deceive over 300 million Americans in regards to Obama's true identity and birth origins. This bogus birth certificate was used to deceive members of our Government, our Judiciary, our Armed Forces, and Law Enforcement into believing that Obama was born in Hawaii, and that he is a natural-born US citizen who is Constitutionally qualified to become President.
Obtaining a real birth certificate copy is the very last thing that Obama would ever do, then or now, because it would absolutely confirm that the images and photos posted on the Internet are forgeries and would expose anyone involved in this fraud to criminal prosecution. Does that sound like a viable MOTIVE for not showing it?
There is no question that Obama fails to meet the Constitutional qualifications for being a natural-born citizen because his father passed his British citizenship onto Obama as a child and made him a dual citizen. But, what about the question of document fraud? Has a crime been committed? Who's responsible? What if a President was complicit in committing this document fraud and intentionally covering it up by all legal means possible?
Conspiracies in Presidential elections do happen. Does "Watergate" ring a bell?
Recently, another Illinois politician was impeached for selling Obama's Senate seat. It that act really worse than committing felony document fraud, as defined by Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section 1028, Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information?.
As people are wont to say at times like this, "Where is the outrage?" Where, indeed.
At the same time that I saw Obama's alleged COLB, a discussion of that image was taking place among the registered readers of a popular blog (HotAir.com) that is a repository of top stories from other blogs and websites. I had not seen these comments until now, ten months after they were published. Although the Hot Air community is mostly pro-Obama, a number of members had identified the very same anomalies as I had while working independently. The significance of this discovery cannot be overstated as it serves to validate the work that I've done in proving this image, and ones to follow, to be false, forged, and fabricated. Here, in their own words, is what they said on June 12:
From JM Hanes:
it really bothers me when something like this simply makes no sense. I couldn't begin to guess who would have fiddled with the document — or the when & why either — but I also can't think of a single logical reason (including filters, sharpening, or conversions) that a scan of an original document could result in the kind of selective pixelization/artifacting in evidence here. Pasting from one image into another, however, would produce precisely that effect.
"The pixilation around the text is...completely inconsistent with the background, which is discontinuous behind the text. Zoom in on the faint image of the reverse “JUN 6 2007? in the lower middle of the doc for comparison and you’ll see that the regular jpeg pixel blocking is uninterrupted. That’s part of whatever this original document was before someone Photoshopped it. The SEAL was probably scanned from another actual document and pasted up along with the necessary text. Nice try with the “Photoshop filter” theory though! In any case, if someone were trying to make a real document look as fake as this one does, that would still be a hoax.
The document looks fake, like the text was layered over the background, not typed onto it. So I downloaded the picture and checked the properties. According to the file’s details, this document was originated in Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh. That’s not proof of forgery, but there’s no “date acquired” listed which would have indicated this was scanned.
Zoom in on the lettering and check out the artefacts surrounding them. I suspect this is a modern document, scanned, original data scrubbed, and overlaid with digital text. Problem is, then not all the text would match stylistically, so they had to go over every bit of text with new lettering. Contrast the artifacts surrounding the text on this document with the text in the top and bottom bars - that’s original text. The text in the body of the document has been doctored. Obama is not claiming it as a legitimate copy. I suspect it is somebody’s legitimate copy, scanned, scrubbed and doctored to look like Obama’s.
As somebody that works with the math and code in such software, I can tell you that these artifacts are nothing of the sort. This is not a case of lossy artefacts due to image encoding (jpeg). Such artifacts would be consistent, these are not. In fact, if you look close enough, you can see that the original lettering was slightly larger than the superimposed fonts.
The point is that an original document would have consistent artifacts due to scanning, and additional consistent artifacts due to further encoding (in this case, jpeg encoding/compression) Whatever the origin of this document, it has been doctored.
03-05-2009 U.S. Senator Bennett:
Please be advised from attorney of the following.
Your choice will be publically exhibited in re-election this year on weither you took a stand for the Constitution, or wiether you let the people of our State down, and I will see to it they all know what choice you made as I have run against you before running 400 radio commercials on 10 different Utah stations, 20 TV adds on 4 different networks, on Internet and print adds, and I think you know, this is exactly what I have been looking for to defeat you.
The People of this State deserve a defence of our God Given divinely inspired Constitution, and this President is running our nation and future generations into a hole of hell! I urge you to choose whom you will serve well; Obama or "We The People", whom have died for our Constitution in battle, fight for our freedom now, and all who stand this day for our Liberty and Freedom, and all the future generations of our Nation. Let all the voices cry out against any intrusive Usurper, and let them cry out against you, if you do nothing!
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
26202 La Paz ste 211
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Dear State Representatives, Senators and US Representatives:
My name is Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq and I am currently representing over a 100 members of the US military from all branches throughout this country. Ranks range from Major General to enlisted. We challenge the legitimacy of Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, for the position of the President and Commander in Chief for following reasons:
1. President has to be a Natural born citizen, meaning born in this country to parents, that are both US citizens. Mr. Obama's father was in this country on a student visa from Kenya, a British Colony at that time. Mr. Obama, Sr was never a US citizen and therefore Mr. Obama is not qualified to be the President of this country.
2. The State of Hawaii, statute 338, allows foreign born children of Hawaiian residents to get an Hawaiian birth certificate. Mr. Obama has never presented any corroborating evidence, that he was actually born in Hawaii. His paternal grandmother in Kenya and the Ambassador of Kenya made statements that he was born in Kenya.
3. The image that Mr. Obama has posted on the Internet was not a valid birth certificate, but rather a limited value document, called Short Version Certification of live birth. The Certification of Live Birth does not name a hospital, name a doctor, have any signatures or a seal of the Hawaiian Health Department on the front of the document. This document is usually given to parties that don't have a proper hospital birth certificate and it is given based on a statement of one relative only. Even the state of Hawaii doesn't give full credit to these documents.
4. The state of Hawaii has sealed Mr. Obama’s birth certificate on file and only stated, that there is a document on file. In spite of numerous demands, the Hawaiian Office of Vital Statistics refused to provide information as to whether it is a certificate for a foreign born child of a resident, is it a proper hospital birth certificate, or a short version COLB of limited value.
5. Even if Mr.Obama had any citizenship status until age 5, he lost it, when he immigrated to Indonesia and acquired Indonesian citizenship. Indonesia doesn't allow dual citizenship and Mr. Obama reaffirmed his Indonesian citizenship, therefore relinquishing his US citizenship, when he traveled using an Indonesian passport as an adult.
6. Mr. Obama has sealed all of his vital records and reportedly spent over $800,000 on an army of attorneys to keep his records sealed and Mr. Obama's attorneys have harassed and intimidated attorneys challenging Obama's eligibility.
7. In spite of Obama's arrogant claims, that all cases were debunked, not one single case was heard on the merits. The courts stated that ordinary citizens have no standing to challenge Obama and courts have no jurisdiction. Not one single person in this country has seen Obama's vital records.
As elected state and US officials, you have a right and an obligation to hold Judicial hearings on issues of paramount importance and you have a right and an obligation to issue subpoenas for production of documents and subpoena witnesses for testimony on such important issues.
My clients, particularly ones that are in active military, such as resident of Tennessee, currently serving in Iraq, Scott Easterling, are in an impossible position. If they follow Obama's orders, as illegitimate Commander in Chief, they will be subject to court martial for following illegal orders. If they are refusing to follow his orders, they can be subject to court martial for insubordination. No member of the US military, that is risking his life and protecting all of our lives, including your lives and the lives of your family members, should be in such predicament. Due to the above, I demand that you request to hold Judicial hearings in the Senate and House of Representatives on the issue of Obama's eligibility and issue the following subpoenas:
1. Subpoena from the State of Hawaii State Department of a certified copy of Obama's original long version (vault) birth certificate.
2. Subpoena from the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, all of Obama's passport and immigration records.
3. Subpoena from the Board of Regents of Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard University all of Obama's college applications and financial aid applications.
4. Subpoena from Mr. Obama a certified copy of all of the above records.
5. Subpoena from the Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, a copy of Obama's certification of the selective military service, as according to a statement, prepared by a retired Federal Agent, Steven Coffman, there is evidence of forgery in the certificate Obama presented to the public.
6. Subpoena from the Regents of the University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg FactCheck.org. explanation and records, as to how did they claim to have examined Obama's birth Certificate and found it valid. Neither the State of Hawaii, nor Obama has ever released such birth certificate and there is no evidence of Obama being born in any hospital in Hawaii, and the only thing that was ever presented, was limited value short version Certification of Live Birth.
I appreciate your expedient assistance in this most important matter of National Security.
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
26302 La Paz ste 211
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Thank you so much for your time and consideration. I hope you choose to forget about this, so all the campaign money you have raised wont do you any good, because you forgot your principles and the Voters will then forget about you. I will be the next Utah U.S. Senator and will defend them. I'm counting on you. if you choose to do something, please get in touch with this Orly Taitz Esq. and she will let me know you have signed on as a patriot, upholding your oath, defending the U.S. Constitution, calling for the appropriate hearings, and I will change my advertisements about you and your service for the People of Utah.
Your Brother in Freedom and Liberty
Cody Robert Judy
Orrin G. Hatch
United States Senator
Your email sent is shown below Feb 12,2009
First Name: Cody
Last Name: Judy
Email Address: email@example.com
What is the general topic of your message? Election
Dear Senator Hatch,
You may already have this, but if you don't , you need to look at it. I nor any of the more then 200,000 who have petitioned the goverment for redress are foolish enough to buy into the unconstitutional doctorine you stated to me in your letter. Although I appreciate you considerate answer, I can't say I believe you are defending the constition by doing nothing on a HEARING FOR VERIFICATION FOR QUALIFICATION TO AVOID IMPEACHMENT TRIAL, for any of your constitutents.
Dear Cordinator, Orly Taitz, and others,
Please find attached the following letters from Senator Bennett -UT-R and Senator Hatch -UT-R the responses to President Obama's qualification as a natural born citizen question.
These are posted on my web site also www.codyjudy.us and the Senators Ltrs link.
Unfortunately, Senator Bennett believes the Hawaiian Official who says it's there is talking about the original birth certificate and it's authentication as a natural born citizen, although that much information would actually be illegal for the official to give out. Senator Hatch believes the 14th Amendment overrides the qualifications of the Presidency found in Art. II Sect. 1 clause 5 as a "natural born", thus he sees no reason Gov.Arnold Schwarzenegger of California bankruptcy fame couldn't be the next U.S. President I suppose. He also believes all these rumors and allegations circulate via the Internet, giving me the chill he'd like to control that too. By these defenses you can easily see they represent unconstitutional falsehoods and premises they make themselves untrue or false senators to the U.S. Constitution; this is easy to see and they should be exposed as they represent themselves.
I'm so sorry my U.S. Senators were no help. I had hoped they would be some what more help in at least asking for hearings on the qualification verification to avoid an impeachment trial. They have every right to ask President Obama to submit his birth certificate for authentication and verification to the U.S. Senate as they can by authority as a legislative branch according to U.S. Consti. Sect. 8 " to constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme court and Art I Sect. 3 the "sole power to try all impeachments".
It would be so easy for the Republican Senators to simply get together and conduct a trial calling it a "qualification verification hearing" necessary to avoid "impeachment trial" and simply demand that in their duty to uphold the U.S. Constitution, which they are sworn to do, that President Obama be the one to produce his original birth certificate to them, or lose his presidency. Asking someone to verify qualification for the job is not an insult, however, as a concerned citizen, and a competitive candidate of the presidential race, I find it very insulting that President Obama spend 800,000 dollars to fight against producing or could we say to hide his original birth certificate, defying over 49 Federal and State law suits and all the citizens bring this issue for constitutional consideration.
While the fight of conservative principles for government is waged on the air waves, and today (02-11-09) most nobly against the stimulus package actually passing the senate, and reportedly passing committee, by Giant Rush Limbaugh and Sentinel Sean Hannity and Gladiator Glenn Beck, these mighty voices weaken to pimp squeak status on this most important constitutional principle, and I don't understand it. Especially when, to me, clearly it seems the easiest way to squelch the fire within our country as the stimulus package burns. The industry of our country put to fire as embers rise up amidst the dry pallets stacked high with oil soaked railroad ties known to most as the sound businesses yard of our country.
Thomas Jefferson said,"It is our duty still to endeavor to avoid war; but if it shall actually take place, no matter by whom brought on, we must defend ourselves. If our house be on fire, without inquiring whether it was fired from within or without, we must try to extinguish it.
Whilst I am of no respect or honor, those who have such seem constitutionally unfit, even to those on the radio air. Yet rather then consider their error, of my heart, they see fit rather to doom the country to dis-honor and then a fix of some sort by none other then those who messed it up. Glenn Beck said most notably that Republican's were the Social-Lite as to the Democrats Socialism.
The problem with that is the force of which it is happening they have underestimated and there be no recovery for those who saw a defense and failed to use it for what would be their excuse to God, but a lie for the defense of the Constitution, when they gave no credit to the qualifications of, as they even called him, Messiah: President Obama. There is no difference to the meaning of their words when it is written and not heard, and I wonder as they slave for paradox, if they ask God to understand their allegiance to negativity?
By God we change, or our country so unquestionably shall begin to inherit all of the Plagues of Revelations, for the decline of constitutional sanity. If Obama is impeached, I have seen our recovery of this recession by 2010 and on a positive note there shall be a refuge from the storms! Set your hearts ladies and gentlemen for the inheritance of your lifetime and what you have championed and what you have trodden under foot. I am under your foot and I think that we all share that idea in common and agree upon it.
Your Brother in Freedom and Liberty,
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for President / 08
Champion for Conservative Values
Dear Senator Bennett:
As to your letter dated Jan. 29th to me regarding President Obama's Original Birth Certificate, you provided information that an Hawaii Official had stated "they had seen and certified President Obama's original birth certificate" and that statement is false. I have found the statement made and it indicates two things State Officials have indicated:
1) Obama has a birth certificate on file
2) And it would be illegal for an official to state information about the person's being naturalized or natural born.
I am forwarding this with the urgency that if something is not done immediately with a Hearing conducted by the Senate on this issue, there may be no going back on a STIMULUS PACKAGE that is the GREATEST ASSAULT on our LIBERTY AND FREEDOM and the U.S. Constitution ever penned in our history as it places us in servitude as well as our future generations!
Please as a Patriot of our Freedoms and Liberty and with the concern of our U.S. Constitution you have elaborated to me that you hold, without delay, assist in creating the needed Hearings Of Qualification Verification to secure the Constitutional Proof President Obama is indeed qualified.
the following is the article of support for my assertion:
December 2008: The Hawaiian Health DepartmentDecember 2008 Blog Archives:
Part of the difficulty in sorting through this issue is that there are a lot of rumors and misinformation on the internet. For example, there was a planted phantom decision about a nonexistent Virginia lawsuit from a "Wild Bill" that surfaced on November 3, 2008. No one has ever been able to verify that this VA lawsuit ever existed.
Similarly, many have claimed that the Hawaiian Health Department has issued a formal statement asserting that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii and the images of the certifications of live birth circulating on the internet are valid Hawaii birth certificates. However, on closer inspection, a lot of these purported official statements by the Hawaiian Health Department seem to evaporate.
For example, the October 31, 2008 offical statement by Director of the Department of Health for the State of Hawaii Dr. Chiyome Fukino is:
"There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama's official birth certificate. State law (Hawai'i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.
"Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai'i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai'i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.
"No state official, including Governor Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawai'i."
which was extrapolated by the Associated Press to produce a story entitled "State declares Obama birth certificate genuine". The Honolulu Advertiser similarly padded this simple official statement into the November 1, 2008 article "Obama's certificate of birth OK, state says", which includes an assertion by reporter Dan Nakaso that "Fukino issued her statement to try to stomp out persistent rumors that Obama was not born in Honolulu — and is therefore not a U.S. citizen and thus ineligible to run for president." Note that this sentence in the article is not attributed to Fukino; this is purely an unfounded claim injected into the piece by the reporter.
One of our team contacted Colin McMahon of the Chicago Tribune, about his December 6, 2008 article, "Barack Obama, Sarah Palin dogged by Internet birth rumors", and he responded by email that we had surely missed the "recent" interviews with Hawaiian officials affirming that Obama was born in Hawaii. When queried about these "recent" interviews, McMahon directed us to this same November 1, 2008 Honolulu Advertiser article. Not particularly recent, and obviously a fairly misleading packaging of the October 31, 2008 official statement by Fukino.
Of course, as most people should know by now, you can have a valid Hawaiian certificate of live birth, either short or long form, and still be born outside of Hawaii or even the US (per Hawaii law 338-17.8). After all, there is even a space for registering foreign births on the form, a box "7C" (see an example of a valid long form showing box 7c here or here). And the Hawaiian Health Department, as far as we have been able to determine, has never issued a statement about what is in box 7C of Obama's certificate of live birth. All that Fukino stated is that "Hawai'i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures." Which to be honest, is somewhat vague and is not really the information that is being sought.
As another example, we are frequently told that Director of Communications of the Hawaiian Department of Health Janice Okubo has verified that Barack Obama is a "natural born citizen". Recently we asked for a source for this, and were given a quote from a post by Chicago Tribune reporter James Janega on the Chicago Tribune's Washington Bureau political blog, "The Swamp", on November 3, 2008,:
Does this mean Obama was born in Hawaii?
"Yes," said Hawaii Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo, in both email and telephone interviews with the Tribune. "That's what Dr. Fukino is saying."
Read the complete blog post to see it in context.
This was supposedly sent to "The Swamp" by email and mentioned in phone conversations with Janice Okubo. It is interesting to me that when our group repeatedly contacted the Hawaiian Health Department, the Hawaiian Health Department representatives stated that they will not discuss whether Obama was born in Hawaii or not, as a matter of policy and law. Others have had similar responses. For example, David Serchuk wrote on Forbes.com on November 21, 2008 that:
"Unfortunately the way state laws are written we are not allowed to confirm vital information and vital records," said Janice Okubo, a spokeswoman for Hawaii's department of health. "I cannot confirm individual information because that is against the law."
She added, though, that Dr. Fukino does have authority over and maintains records for individuals born in Hawaii.
If Janega's blog post is accurate, then the Hawaiian Health Department should issue a formal statement on this issue. Perhaps some compromise could be found which reveals the information that is being sought, but still protects the privacy of the individuals involved. It is unfortunate that the Hawaii government and/or the Obama clique has not allowed this, particularly when Hawaiian government officials and Obama are being sued in court over this matter in more than one complaint. More openness would probably have prevented this current unpleasant situation.
If someone in the Hawaiian Health Department was willing to make this sort of assertion in print, or better yet, under oath, then this entire contretemps would probably not have ballooned to its present proportions. However, the incredible amount of foot-dragging, evasion, ambiguous statements and legal wrangling makes it less likely that most skeptics will be satisfied by anything except a careful examination of the evidence at this point.
The short form document Obama produced, the Hawaiian certification of live birth (as distinct from the Hawaiian certificate of live birth, or long form document) has much less information on it, and is lacking information about the hospital and attending physician, etc. This extra information can be used to corroborate the information on the document. The short form document is even judged to be inadequate for participating in Hawaiian government programs. Also, in some circumstances, the Hawaiian birth documents can be changed later.
As an aside, it is interesting that two different "original" Hawaiian certifications of live birth have been produced by the Obama campaign, at factcheck.org and fightthesmears.com. I wonder why they produced two different documents? Both are "originals"? How can there be two originals? Why are they so different? Could it be that a more convincing version had to be produced after many deficiencies in the "fightthesmears" digital image were pointed out?
Continued Ltr. Cody to Senator Bennett
thank you for your consideration of this and please feel free to let me know how else I can be of any assistance to you in this regard.
Your Bro. in Freedom and Liberty
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate 2008 President
Orrin G Hatch
Utah United States Senate-
Washington DC 20510-4402
Jace Johnson- Chief of Staff
104 Hart Senate Office Building
February 4, 2009
Dear Mr. Judy:
Thank you for your letter expressing your concern about the eligibility of President Barack Obama for the Presidency of the United States.
I am aware of a number of rumors and allegations, primarily circulated via the internet, that president Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the U.S. I certainly understand your concern regarding this issue. Indeed, I have the utmost respect and reverence for our nations’s constitutional values and, as your Senator I have made the preservation of those values my highest priority. I am always wary of any effort to undermine the intent of those who drafted the Constitution.
However, while there are some potentially complicated laws regarding U.S. citizenship the facts are pretty simple with regard to President Obama. The first section of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution reads as follows:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
President Obama was born in Hawaii, making him a natural-born citizen, regardless of the status of either of his parents. During the election campaign, he produced a certified copy of his birth certificate and made it available for examination. While some have claimed that document is a forgery, Hawaii state officials have publically verified that the copy is authentic and that the state health department holds the original. At this point, I see no valid reason to doubt the authenticity of birth certificate or the President’s status as a natural-born citizen.
Thank you, once again, for your letter. Sincerely,
The signature of Orrin Hatch affixed
Orrin G. Hatch
OGH:mbhh U.S. Senator
Cody Robert Judy
U.S. Senator Robert F. Bennett
UNITED STATES SENATE
WASHINGTON DC 20510-4403
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
February 4th, 2009
Dear Senator Bennett:
Thank you for your January 29th letter returning to me your answer to my query of the U.S. Constitutional eligibility of President Barack Obama. While I thank you for your very gracious letter, and express my gratitude for your assured commitment to me of your support for the U.S. Constitution, I plead with you to forebear with me one more time in my assertion that you as a U.S. Senator have every right, indeed a duty with your oath to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution, to actual require President Barack Obama, to submit to a “hearing of qualification” for order, to prove his eligibility by your personal witness in ORDER to BE PRESIDENT of the United States of America: Please indulge my elaboration.
I understand that you as a U.S. Senator do not have jurisdiction over any particular court proceeding or the Judicial Branch of our Government, and that it truly is set up to adhere to a set of rules and regulation of its characteristics outlined also by our U.S. Constitution. However, the Legislative Branch has the power to “constitute Tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court and indeed the Senate body has the sole power to try all impeachments to, but shall not extend but to the removal from Office of honor.
Now I express to you Senator that in order to uphold the U.S. Constitution, and specifically the honorary qualifications of the U.S. President said therein, that the only evidence you presented to me for the absolute honor of qualification of the President of the United States, was the “said so” of some unknown official without oath, or affirmation in writing who lives in Hawaii.
My question to you is if indeed someone has seen the original birth certificate, where is the written certification to the U.S. Senate, by which, you can fully stand in confidence of the matter knowing it to be true? Sir, I understand to the very detail that Hawaii is unwilling to submit this “Original Birth Certificate” of any known citizen or any person without tangible interest to the record and I’m not suggesting that they have to do that. I am herein of the spirit that Barrack Obama indeed, to continue to be President, must submit his own birth certificate to the U.S. Senate, to prove its authenticity by his own submission to the rule and law of the U.S. Constitution, and that the lack of the submission in trial of impeachment, would constitute his ineligibility! Thusly, the U.S. Senate does not have to wait on testimony from a Hawaiian official, but can rely upon the subject of impeachment. For probable cause a hearing can be held and all the evidence submitted to the Senate of ineligibility by testimony, witnesses, and documents which surmount enormously over the unsworn oath or affirmation of some “said so” of some unknown official in Hawaii. Do you realize Sir, Barack Obama has spent over 800,000 U.S. dollars to keep this document under wraps or from public view? What placement of “honor” and “submission” is this of the U.S. President to the U.S. Constitution? In my view, it is 800,000 wasted U.S. dollars to keep the citizens of your state enthralled in judicial proceedings that waste our own fortunes on his non submission to the qualification vetting of the office he wishes us to support him in. I say Sir, does anyone think that strange investment of hard earned money?
I would like you to verify for me Sir, that you have indeed watched the video commercial that is first on my web site www.codyjudy.us that you would know that the networks of the public trust refused to air or sell air time to this commercial, and that I as a Presidential Candidate had ever right to buy and air that commercial just the same as Barrack Obama bought and aired his commercials. To the least of my request to you, that I receive a letter forewarning the unfair practices of advertisement to all media outlets if the subject of this commercial, being not lewd or vulgar, be sold to me for fair price, or they risk their own hearing before the U.S. Senate to explain these unethical practices in this Republic known for freedom and liberty. Those evidences in the commercial providing for you the necessary probable cause for “hearings for qualification” or “hearing for impeachment of the President” I pray you can establish with request to the proper committee for me to submit my witness as may seem necessary.
Finally, I express to you Sir, the hearings of Senator Tom Daschle D and many others for President Obama’s administration scrutinized or vetted far more critically by piers and colleagues then asking for a simple original birth certificate. Isn’t what’s good for the goose good for the gander and what of the birds of a feather that flock together? In order to hold the most powerful position of our United States as President, and avoid impeachment proceedings, I request a simple “hearing for qualification verification” and that the President show himself of honor to his duty to “uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution” to the best of his ability and forthrightly put to rest the sum of 49 law suits filed around the country and most importantly the distrust and insecurity of our country’s civilian population over which 200,000 have signed petitions for disclosure of President Obama’s birth certificate certified to the U.S. Supreme Court, and I believe that you as a most trusted servant of our U.S. Constitution have the ability as a U.S. Senator for this greatest honor and historic legacy. Thank you Senator for your ear in this matter, I look forward to your decisions and considerations.
Your brother in Freedom and Liberty,
Cody Robert Judy
Dear U.S. Senator Bennett and all Fellow January 14, 2009 and the RETURN LETTER JAN 29TH,2009
I come to you in humble respect and defense of our U.S. Constitution. While we were opponents in the 2004 U.S. Senate Race, one thing I hope, very sincerely, we have in common is a great love for our U.S. Constitution. We need to stall or delay the ratification of President Elect Obama's inauguration in any way you can see fit, I care about the qualification of our President in our beloved Constitution and even filed suit in the Judicial Branch against Senator (Presidential Candidate) McCain as he was born in the Panama Canal Zone and recieved his citizenship by law 11 months after his birth.( I just learned five minutes ago, my suit was denide)
This law suit is the only one left in the United States filed before the Republican National Convention challenging Sen. McCain's and Sen. Obama's qualifications as "Natural Born Citizens", and is the KEY to enforcing our U.S. Constitution.
All the law suits brought against Obama in some 13 states,(see video on ObamaForgery.com) have been dismissed because of lack of "Standing". Mine is the only one in the Country that has standing because I was a candidate also! No other presidential candidate filed a law suit to defend our Constitutional requirements of qualification.
My law suit Federal Nevada District (Las Vegas) Judy v. McCain 08-cv-01162 has 4 pending motions that the Judge has sat on for over nearly 4 months because, I think, the burden is so great. In all the evidence presented both candidates were ineligible according to laws held in statute at the time of their birth. Don't expect you to know those off hand.
The reason this affects Republicans in your state is simple.. imagine if you will 46% of all American's vote simply not counted. Is that fair? 46% of America voted for McCain, including all the electoral votes from Utah being R's, do you think it fair as a representing Senator to look all of your constituents in the face and tell them their Presidential Vote simply didn't count? And this question to every Republican Senator seated right now also?
I can't imagine you doing that Sir. That is why I implore you to put forth a measure or bill stating a demand for Obama's Original Birth Certificate, held in secret, in the fault, or delay Inauguration.
Please forward this to all Republican Senators and without sounding condescending, Please be a champion for our U.S. Constitution!
Your fellow Patriot and Brother in Freedom and Liberty,
Cody Robert Judy
RETURNED LETTER FROM U.S. SENATOR BENNETT
UNITED STATES SENATE
WASHINGTON DC 20510-4403
Dear Mr. Judy:
Thank you for writing regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility to be President of the United States. I appreciate hearing from you and apologize for the delay in my response.
As you know, there has been some doubt cast on the authenticity of President Obama’s birth certificate with reference to whether he is a natural born citizen of the United States. Those doubting the legitimacy of the birth certificate made available online by the Obama campaign have asked the state of Hawaii to release his birth certificate to the public for verification; however, Hawaii state law does not allow officials to release vital records, such as birth certificates, to any person without tangible interest to the record. While the state of Hawaii legally cannot release President Obama’s birth certificate, in October 2008, Hawaiian officials said they had personally seen and certified the legitimacy of President Obama’s original birth certificate.
As for the court cases that have been filed requesting further evidence of the legitimacy of President Obama’s birth certificate, as a Senator, I do not have jurisdiction in any court proceedings, but rest assured that I firmly support the Constitution and will continue to monitor this issue with that in mind.
Thank you again for writing.
Signature Affixed of Robert F. Bennett
Robert F. Bennett
United States Senator
Letters to the U.S. Senate 2009